Home 9 Contact Us 9 Submissions 9 Proof Reading and Cypress House Style


You may have heard the phrase; “A man sees what he wants to see and disregards the rest”. One would think that a music editor would be impeccable about details but we need your help! Please use the fine-toothed comb approach – bar by bar.

Cypress has the advantage of fixing and improving a score at any time between printings. However, we really want to get things perfect from the start.


  • spelling
  • hyphenation – according to a proper dictionary
  • slurs and ties
  • word extensions
  • breathing marks
  • accents – including word stress tenuto markings
  • accidentals and reminder accidentals
  • dynamic markings
  • credits – dedications
  • rehearsal marks
  • spacing and legibility

For more info, please read our WRITING FOR CHOIRS page.


Less is More
Some scores are needlessly fastidious. Cypress opts for “less is more” clarity, allowing for choir directors and piano players to make small musical interpretations. Composers need to trust choir directors. A choir pianist is often the most well trained musician in the group. Overly marked scores can come across as condescending – as if directors were not able to grasp the obvious. (e.g. when a soprano line divides into 2 parts, is it really necessary to add “divisi” or “div.”? What would the sopranos do if you didn’t add the obvious instruction? Would they say “What do we do now!!?” – ha ha ha) However, that being stated, breath marks, rehearsal letters, etc. can really save time during a rehearsal.  Cypress tries to find a balance between the unnecessary and the helpful time savers.

The proof is in the pudding
While editing a score, Cypress listens to rubber-meets-the-road performances to see if the composer’s wishes were practically manifested. Then Cypress adjusts breathing and phrasing to emulate genuine performances. Composers are usually happy for such small helpful additions.

Short Story from Dr. Nickel (Cypress editor)
I’ll never forget having my first piece published – long ago. The typesetter happened to live close to my home so I gave him my score – which had LOTS of DETAILS, including phrase markings.  He said, “Larry, sing this” – and I complied.  Then he removed some of the markings – including the phrase markings and said, “Now sing this” – which I did.  He didn’t need to say anything further.  I realized that my overly fastidious markings didn’t amount to a hill of beans.  He concluded, “Trust directors and singers to be musical and don’t patronize them with needless markings.”

Is it really necessary to say “espressivo” – or “cantabile”? Don’t all directors strive to have their choirs sing expressively? Do they need reminding? “Cantabile” = in a smooth singing style. (hmm) Doesn’t natural phrasing and word stress take care of that? Worse yet “Cantando” – a term which has most directors looking for the dictionary.  In short, please avoid redundancy.

Should not be “ca” or “circa”. Unless the director is a living metronome, the tempo will be approximate in any case – so just state the ideal tempo and it will be approximate anyway.

The Tritone (devil’s interval) is generally a big no-no in any singing passage; unless applied the way Bach used it (as a leading tone in the bass line)

Intervals: remember that a singer needs to hear a note in his/her mind before singing it (unlike playing the piano). So a minor 6th needs to look like a 6th (not an augmented 5th) and a minor 3rd needs to look like a 3rd (not an augmented 2nd) – and so on.

Voice leading is our specialty. It needs to be intuitive and approachable for average singers. Seemingly easy music can be difficult to sing and tune, depending on the voice leading. Seemingly complex music can be easy to sing and tune – depending on the voice leading.

Please avoid Cross Voicing – e.g. the altos singing below the tenors (unless you are trying to sustain a melodic passage)

There’s a reason why parallel fifths were once strictly forbidden. They are hard to tune! Parallel 2nds are also a voice-leading issue. Parallel octaves are a quick way to reveal discrepancies in pitch between the two lines. Rudimentary voice leading rules help choirs to sound good.

Breathing: Cypress adds breath marks and also specific rests (for breaths and articulation). If a breath requires a quarter beat, the notation should indicate precisely that – with a quarter rest. This saves all kinds of time during rehearsals! Words ending with consonants such as “t” or “d” need to be pronounced in unison (use a specific rest). Words ending in open vowels or consonants such as “m” are more forgiving – and a breath mark works fine.

Closed scoring (two staves – hymn-style voicing) is great for homophonic music – when all singers are singing the text in tandem. Open scoring (four staves) is essential for polyphony.

Rehearsal letters are important for expediting rehearsal time.

Cypress slurs melismatic passages of text – according to the syllables. However, there is no need to slur long passages of “Oos” and “Ahs”.

The Font which is easiest to read – Times Roman.

Hyphenation should be made according to the dictionary – not according to the way one might prefer to hear it. For example, imagine “another” sung on half notes per syllable”. One might be tempted to write “a – no – ther”, right? But the hyphenation is actually “an-oth-er”. One composer even hyphenated “Music” improperly – hahaha. A quick way to check? – simply google “define music”.  Wouldn’t “Toxic” be hyphenated the same way?

Divisi – e.g. SSAATTBB can look intimidating to directors of average choirs (most choirs). So, composers are asked to use them judiciously. It takes great skill to write a solid SATB composition (without divisi). Consider Mozart’s “Ave Verum Corpus” – perhaps the most exquisite motet every written.

Expression – musical terms should be given in the universally accepted musical language; for example “adagio” rather than “slowly and calmly”. Cypress markets around the world and Japanese (for example) understand the traditional terms. Use the most common terms: Ritardando (Rit.) instead of Rallentando (Rall.)

Expression (part 2) – avoid using needlessly persnickety terms such as “like a falling feather” – especially in English. Affectations such as “like a bubbling brook” just raise questions marks and slow down the rehearsal. How about “like the wind”? – this could result in a breathy tone quality – like Monroe’s “Happy birthday, Mr. President”. – ha ha

Fortes should never be louder than beautiful unless the composer intends to convey anger. One composer sent us a piece with a quadruple forte ( ffff), which means really, really, REALLY loud. Just “loud” should be adequate. So double fortes are rarely found in a Cypress score.

Cypress uses double bar lines and rehearsal marks at significant musical moments, such as verses and choruses, key changes, tempo changes, etc. (this is designed to facilitate choir rehearsals).

Syncopated passages – the importance of beaming.  Average singers need to see beats 3 and 4.  (beats 1 and 2 are readily apparent)  Click here for an explanation.

Piano parts look tidy without too many slurs, phrase marking, hairpin dynamics, etc  “Pedal freely” and “espressivo” is all a reasonably proficient piano player needs.

Reminder Accidentals – while we understand that a bar-line cancels earlier accidentals, reminder accidentals can really add clarity for singers and accompanists.

Piano reductions for a cappella scores are “bare bones” without slurs, tempo markings or dynamics.

Mixing sharps and flats in the same passage is generally confusing and not wise. For singers a minor 3rd needs to look like a 3rd and not an augmented 2nd. (For example F up to Ab is more intuitive – easier to navigate –  than F up to G#.)

Dynamic hairpins should usually have a beginning and ending dynamic marking. (rather than leave the director pondering questions such as “crescendo to what? – how much louder?”)

Dynamic markings – Please stick with the tried and true traditional markings. Examples: fm+, fm-, pseudo pp, poco mp, più mf, These are affectations which mean little to singers and only frustrate the process. Wouldn’t an mp+ sound much like an mf – ? – and how would one measure that? – with a decibel meter? What if the choir is 12 singers – or 75 singers? Trust the director and trust the singers to shape your intentions with a healthy dose of their own passion.

Fermatas are vague. Hold? – for how long? Leave it up to the director.

Dotted slurs indicate “carry the phrase without a breath”. Breath mark indications can really help expedite a rehearsal.

6/8 or 9/8 time; we used dotted quarter rests because they communicate better than a whole rest for an entire bar. A whole rest in a 6/8 bar looks like 4 counts to some singers.  Two dotted quarter rests would be a user-friendly option.

Note stems for divisi on one staff can go in opposite directions or in the same direction depending on formatting needs and legibility – and it’s not crucial to be consistent.

Pedalling is largely left to the pianists’ discretion – rather than cluttering up the score with pedal on and off markings. Occasionally very specific directions are relevant at certain points in the score. However, “pedal freely” or “pedal with harmonic changes” usually work for a competent piano player and they love the freedom to be musicians.

“Through” instead of “Thru” when spacing allows. “Thru” is in the dictionary too and Cypress doesn’t hesitate to use it in order to avoid word crowding.

Tempo markings are indicated in bold font and capitalized only at the start of sections. This includes tempo indications such as “meno mosso” and “rit.” (technique font)

Style comments such as “legato” or “marcato” are indicated in non-bold italics (expression font)