PROOF READING AND CYPRESS HOUSE STYLE

Home > Contact Us > Submissions > Proof Reading and Cypress House Style

PROOF READING

You may have heard the phrase; “A man sees what he wants to see and disregards the rest”. One would think that a music editor would be impeccable about details but we need your help! Please use the fine-toothed comb approach – bar by bar.

Cypress has the advantage of fixing and improving a score at any time between printings. However, we really want to get things perfect from the start.

CHECK

  • spelling
  • hyphenation – according to a proper dictionary
  • slurs and ties
  • breathing marks
  • accents – including word stress tenuto markings
  • accidentals and reminder accidentals
  • dynamic markings
  • credits – dedications
  • rehearsal marks
  • spacing and legibility

For more info, please read our WRITING FOR CHOIRS page.

CYPRESS HOUSE STYLE

Less is More
Some scores are needlessly fastidious. Cypress opts for “less is more” clarity, allowing for choir directors and piano players to make small interpretations. Composers need to trust choir directors. Overly marked scores can come across as patronizing/condescending – as if directors were not able to grasp the obvious. However, that being stated, breath marks, rehearsal letters, etc. can really save time during a rehearsal.  Cypress tries to find a balance between the unnecessary and the helpful time savers.

Short Story from Larry
I’ll never forget having my first piece published – long ago. The typesetter happened to live close to my home so I gave him my score – which had LOTS of DETAILS, including phrase markings.  He said, “Larry, sing this” – and I complied.  Then he removed some of the markings – including the phrase markings and said, “Now sing this” – which I did.  He didn’t need to say anything further.  I realized that my overly fastidious markings didn’t amount to a hill of beans.  He concluded, “Trust directors and singers to be musical and don’t patronize them with needless markings.”

Redundancy
Is it really necessary to say “espressivo” – or “cantabile”? Don’t all directors strive to have their choirs sing expressively? Do they need reminding? “Cantabile” – in a smooth singing style. (duh!) Doesn’t natural phrasing and word stress take care of that? Worse yet “Cantando” – a term which has most directors running for the dictionary.  In short, please avoid redundancy.

Tempo 
Should not be “ca” or “circa”. Unless the director is a living metronome, the tempo will be approximate in any case – so just state the ideal tempo and it will be approximate anyway.

Cypress prefers to notate syncopations so that the actual beats are more readily apparent.

The Tritone (devil’s interval) is generally a big no-no in any singing passage; unless applied the way Bach used it (as a leading tone in the bass line)

Intervals: remember that a singer needs to hear a note in his/her mind before singing it (unlike playing the piano). So a minor 6th needs to look like a 6th (not an augmented 5th) and a minor 3rd needs to look like a 3rd (not an augmented 2nd) – and so on.

Voice leading is our specialty. It needs to be intuitive and approachable for average singers. Seemingly easy music can be difficult to sing and tune, depending on the voice leading. Seemingly complex music can be easy to sing and tune – depending on the voice leading.

Please avoid Cross Voicing – e.g. the altos singing below the tenors.

There’s a reason why parallel fifths were once strictly forbidden. They are hard to tune! Parallel 2nds are also an issue.

Breathing: Cypress adds breath marks and also specific rests (for breaths and articulation). If a breath requires a quarter beat, the notation should indicate precisely that – with a quarter rest. This saves all kinds of time during rehearsals! Words ending with consonants such as “t” need to be pronounced in unison (use a specific rest). Words ending in open vowels or consonants such as “m” are more forgiving – and a breath mark works fine.

Closed scoring (two staves – hymn-style voicing) is great for homophonic music – when all singers are singing the text in tandem. Open scoring (four staves) is essential for polyphony. 

Rehearsal letters are important for expediting rehearsal time.

Cypress slurs melismatic passages of text – according to the syllables. However, there is no need to slur long passages of “Oos” and “Ahs”.

The Font which is easiest to read – Times Roman.

Hyphenation should be made according to the dictionary – not according to the way one might prefer to hear it. For example, imagine “another” sung on half notes per syllable”. One might be tempted to write “a – no – ther”, right? But the hyphenation is actually “an-oth-er”.

Divisi – e.g. SSAATTBB can look intimidating to directors of average choirs (most choirs). So, composers are asked to use them judiciously.

Expression – musical terms are given in the universally accepted musical language; for example “adagio” rather than “slowly and calmly”. Cypress markets around the world and Japanese (for example) understand the traditional terms. Use the most common terms: Ritardando (Rit.) instead of Rallentando (Rall.)

Expression (part 2) – avoid using needlessly fastidious terms such as “like a falling feather” – especially in English. Affectations such as “like a bubbling brook” just raise questions marks and slow down the rehearsal. How about “like the wind”? – this could result in a breathy tone quality – like Monroe’s “Happy birthday, Mr. President”.

Fortes should never be louder than beautiful unless the composer intends to convey anger. One composer sent us a piece with a quadruple forte ( ffff), which means really, really, REALLY loud. Just “loud” should be adequate. So double fortes are rarely found in a Cypress score.

Cypress uses double bar lines and rehearsal marks at significant musical moments, such as verses and choruses, key changes, tempo changes, etc. (this is designed to facilitate choir rehearsals and reveal the form).

Syncopated passages – the importance of beaming.  Average singers need to see beats 3 and 4.  (beats 1 and 2 are readily apparent)  Click here for an explanation.

Piano parts look tidy without too many slurs, phrase marking, hairpin dynamics, etc “pedal freely” and “espressivo” is all a reasonably proficient piano player needs.

Piano reductions for a cappella scores are “bare bones” without slurs, tempo markings or dynamics.

Mixing sharps and flats in the same passage is generally confusing and not wise.

Dynamic hairpins should always have a beginning and ending dynamic marking. (rather than leave the director pondering questions such as “crescendo to what? – how loud?”)

Fermatas are vague. Hold? – for how long? Leave it up to the director.

Dotted slurs indicate “carry the phrase without a breath”. Breath mark indications can really help expedite a rehearsal.

6/8 or 9/8 time; we used dotted quarter rests because they communicate better than a whole rest for an entire bar. 

Note stems for divisi on one staff can go in opposite directions or in the same direction depending on formatting needs and legibility – and it’s not crucial to be consistent.

Pedalling is largely left to the pianists’ discretion -rather than cluttering up the score with pedal on and off markings. Occasionally very specific directions are relevant at certain points in the score. However, “pedal freely” usually works for a competent piano player and they love the freedom.

“Through” instead of “Thru” when spacing allows. “Thru” is in the dictionary too and Cypress doesn’t hesitate to use it in order to avoid word crowding.

Tempo markings are indicated in bold font and capitalized only at the start of sections. This includes tempo indications such as “meno mosso” and “rit.” (technique font)

Style comments such as “legato” or “marcato” are indication in non-bold italics (expression font)

SOCIAL MEDIA

FACEBOOK
SOUNDCLOUD

JOIN MAILING LIST

CONTACT

+1-604-221-1608

General Inquiries:
cypresschoralmusic@gmail.com
Dr. Larry Nickel (Editor):
larrynickel@mac.com